PlayBlizzard.com

35 thoughts on “Should You ALWAYS Test For Counterspell…? | Hearthstone Daily Moments Ep.1496”

1. Wassup

2. hello from Chile!!! love your videos guys

3. second 😀

4. Silencing weapons would in my opinion get confusing, especially with all the buffing that can be done to them. I say it's better to just leave silencing to minions and the occasional hero power

5. I think silencing a weapon would be interesting but not a hero power. For the weapon I think it should be for like a turn or 2

6. Silencing weapons and hero powers would have been useful tech but now there is stickyfingers and that other card that swaps hero power, so I feel they would be kinda underwhelming.

7. Ну че там с деньгами?

8. omega LUL

9. Should You ALWAYS Test For Counterspell?

   yes

10. boop

11. Answering the title: yes, always assume it's a randomly generated counterspell. You learn the hard way

12. I feel that there really isn't a need to silence weapons as there really isn't enough value to do so, destroying them is a lot safer

13. Balanced number for quest mage spells is 20. They could still complete it, but they would at least have to draw 2/3 of their deck and be at ten mana a few turns, giving a aggro or midrange opponent a good chance to win the game and have some interaction.

14. I think Silence Weapon effects are too situational for them to be useful because 1. They need a weapon 2. It Has to Have to have an effect on it/buff 3- Weapon destroying is better than silence against every weapon but kings bane

15. I just came up with a great idea but I'm gonna need you to be open minded… Hailey Darthstone Munny Foments

16. Should I always test counterspell? No, always test when you have resources to win the trade or play differently when you have an option that hero doesn’t rely on spell. It is the golden rule that you need to gain advantage or deny’s opponent’s advantage.

17. If this were the time when Kingsbane was rampant, sure
    But nowadays, it seems to be unneeded

18. Silencing hero powers would be incredibly weak in my opinion if it's temporary, and pretty op if it's permanent. And Silencing weapons seems too confusing — and again, weak — to ever do right.

19. My guy 4:10 didn't know that against all laws of Discard mechanics, Soul Fire always discards Soul Fire.

20. Hey that's me at 5:58! If you guys liked that clip you can see more at my twitch, drop a follow if you enjoyed 🙂

21. Comment question : Which class secret do you like most?

22. 7:15 that priest should HP for that 8mana priest dragon tho.

23. Why do they try so hard to kill their own games i dont understand

24. say hi to fandango tomorrow

25. I think we can agree that we should see some toasters here.

26. 0:44 I don't think Flare can trigger Counter Spell.

27. Anyone else kinda tired of altruis clips

28. Why silence a weapon when you can play a 2 mana 3-2 that destroys the weapon?

29. ehhh… i cant send it =(

30. In response to the title: yes, his play was correct, but he was really unlucky. That's just hearthstone punishing correct plays as usual.

31. Rip kingsbane, silence a weapon would be strong, btw we have ooze xD

32. Not gonna lie… That 2/2 golden pogo got me really hard xD

33. No,weapons not being able to be slienced is the only reason why kingsbane was made,also it will be quite confusing for players

34. That Flare is like a piece of shxt……

35. wtf is that question? why would you silence a weapon? you just play ooze(s) or stickyfinger

Comments are closed.